Tuesday, August 29, 2017

"This demonstration of effective end-to-end system performance in a realistic ballistic flight environment marks another on-time achievement for the B61-12 Life Extension Program,” said Brig. Gen. Michael Lutton, NNSA’s principal assistant deputy administrator for military application. “The successful test provides critical qualification data to validate that the baseline design meets military requirements. It reflects the nation's continued commitment to our national security and that of our allies and partners."

 NNSA said that in conjunction with the US Air Force, it had completed the first qualification flight test of B61-12 gravity nuclear bomb on March 14 at the Tonopah Test Range in Nevada."
Four months later, and just as concerns over North Korea's provocative launches have send shockwaves across global markets - again - the US National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) announced another successful flight test of B61-12 gravity nuclear bombs in Nevada. The second qualification flight test for the nuclear bomb was carried out by the NNSA and the US Air Force.

According to the NNSA press release, two B61-12 gravity bombs (without a nuclear warhead) were dropped from F-15 fighter jets on August 8 at Tonopah Test Range in Nevada, and were designed to test the "non-nuclear functions and the aircraft’s capability to deliver the weapon." These tests are part of a series over the next three years to qualify the B61-12 for service. As we noted at the time, the first qualification flight test occurred in March.
“The B61-12 life extension program is progressing on schedule to meet national security requirements,” said Phil Calbos, acting NNSA deputy administrator for Defense Programs. “These realistic flight qualification tests validate the design of the B61-12 when it comes to system performance.”
According to the editor-in-chief of National Defense magazine, Igor Korotchenko, the second test of the nuclear bomb could indicate that Washington is speeding up its rearmament program. "The fact of the test of this modification of the nuclear bomb indicates that the US continues an accelerated rearmament program of its tactical nuclear arsenal in Europe, as well as that both Washington and Brussels are considering the scenario of a limited nuclear war in Europe," he said.
Furthermore, as RT reminds us, the test comes two months after Politico reported that US senators were pushing legislation to compel President Donald Trump to take steps to develop new missiles which would be “the first steps to jettisoning what is known as the INF treaty.” Moscow said that such a move would be “ridiculous” and would damage America itself as well as its European allies.  In July, Republican Senator Tom Cotton, a member of the House Armed Services Committee, suggested bypassing the milestone treaty that bans the testing, production and possession of land-based intermediate-range missiles by both Moscow and Washington. He urged the White House to “facilitate the transfer of cruise missile technology to our (American) allies,” explaining that “only the US and Russia have signed this treaty. No other country did.”
After the announcement of the plans to upgrade the B61 nuclear weapon, Russia expressed its concerns that the move could destabilize global security. “This means that the armaments threshold could in theory have been lowered, which of course will destabilize the situation to a certain extent,”said the deputy head of Russia’s Foreign Ministry, Sergey Ryabkov, in August 2016.  The program, started under President Obama means that over the next 30 years Washington could spend up to $1 trillion to modernize the US nuclear arsenal. Shortly after his election, president Trump called for the US to “greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability,” though he criticized the Obama administration’s costly modernization program during the election campaign.
* * *
The latest test was the second in a series that will be conducted over the next three years to qualify the B61-12 for service. Three successful development flight tests were conducted in 2015.
"This demonstration of effective end-to-end system performance in a realistic ballistic flight environment marks another on-time achievement for the B61-12 Life Extension Program,” said Brig. Gen. Michael Lutton, NNSA’s principal assistant deputy administrator for military application. “The successful test provides critical qualification data to validate that the baseline design meets military requirements. It reflects the nation's continued commitment to our national security and that of our allies and partners."
"The flight test included hardware designed by Sandia and Los Alamos National Laboratories, manufactured by the Nuclear Security Enterprise plants, and mated to the tail-kit assembly section, designed by the Boeing Company under contract with the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center," the NNSA statement said.

Phil Hoover, an engineer at Sandia National Laboratories, shows off a flight test 

body for a B61-12 nuclear weapon
The B61-12 consolidates and replaces four B61 bomb variants in the nation’s nuclear arsenal. The first production unit is scheduled to be completed by March 2020.
The original B61 gravity bomb is the mainstay of the Air Force’s nuclear arsenal and one of the legs of the so-called nuclear triad, along with the intercontinental ballistic missiles deployed from either ground-based silos or oceangoing submarines. The B61 nuclear gravity bomb, deployed from U.S. Air Force and NATO bases, has almost 50 years of service, "making it the oldest and most versatile weapon in the enduring U.S. stockpile." Numerous modifications have been made to improve the B61’s safety, security, and reliability since the first B61 entered service in 1968, and four B61 variants remain in the stockpile: the 3, 4, 7, and 11. However, the aging weapon system requires a life extension to continue deterring potential adversaries and reassuring our allies and partners of our security commitments to them.
The B61-12 LEP will refurbish, reuse, or replace all of the bomb’s nuclear and non-nuclear components to extend the service life of the B61 by at least 20 years, "and to improve the bomb’s safety,  effectiveness, and security" according to the NNSA. The B61-12 first production unit will occur in FY 2020. The bomb will be approximately 12 feet long and weigh approximately 825 pounds. The bomb will be air-delivered in either ballistic gravity or guided drop modes, and is being certified for delivery on current strategic (B-2A) and dual capable aircraft (F-15E, F-16C/D & MLU, PA-200) as well as future aircraft platforms (F-35, B-21).
President Trump has endorsed the ambitious and expensive plan to modernize the US nuclear triad, begun under his predecessor.
The August test of the B61-12 was the second in a series with the final design review due in September 2018 and the first production unit scheduled for completion by March 2020. Once the bomb is authorized for use in 2020, the US plans to deploy some 180 of the B61-12 precision-guided thermonuclear bombs to five European countries as follows:
  • Belgium - 20;
  • Germany -20;
  • Italy - 70;
  • Netherlands - 20;
  • Turkey -50;
... although in light of the recent deterioration in relations between Washington and Ankara, it will likely consider reassessing the Turkish deployment.

Sunday, August 27, 2017

It’s the go-to provider of components for the next generation of military defense – electronic warfare.Everything has been made as easy as possible for you to maximize the profit potential. symbols $CBHMY 3.30, $CBHMF 1.74 $BAESY , $30

It just so happens that, right now, investing in Trump penny stocks is the most explosive opportunity out there…

But every month I’ll publish my best ideas in True Alpha.

In the hedge fund world, "alpha" is defined as the abnormal rate of return…

Abnormal returns aren’t just random, though – they’re realized through “event driven” special situations.n a September election speech, Donald Trump said he would “ask Congress to fully eliminate the defense sequester and submit a new budget to rebuild our military.”

That means we’re going to see massive new military spending.

Now, there aren’t many tiny defensive stocks out there.

But we’ve found one that’s perfectly positioned to benefit from this boom.

Even though this company trades below $1…

It’s the go-to provider of components for the next generation of military defense – electronic warfare.


In order to see these life-changing gains, you must act soon. There’s no time to waste.
These stocks won’t remain cheap for long.
You can find the names and ticker symbols of the top five Trump penny stocks inside your guide Five Trump Penny Stocks That Could Make You Rich.
Abnormal returns aren’t just random, though – they’re realized through “event driven” special situations.n a September election speech, Donald Trump said he would “ask Congress to fully eliminate the defense sequester and submit a new budget to rebuild our military.”
That means we’re going to see massive new military spending.
Now, there aren’t many tiny defensive stocks out there.
But we’ve found one that’s perfectly positioned to benefit from this boom.
Even though this company trades below $1…
It’s the go-to provider of components for the next generation of military defense – electronic warfare.
When to buy…
And because these stocks can move really fast, I’ll often recommend a buy-up-to price, so my readers know not to take undue risks chasing these plays.
Everything has been made as easy as possible for you to maximize the profit potential.
symbols $CBHMY 3.30, $CBHMF 1.74 $BAESY , $30

Saturday, August 26, 2017

There is a strong precedent for the head of the Federal Reserve to announce policy changes at Jackson Hole compared with the other major central banks. However, after the minutes of the July meeting it looks like the Fed has pressed pause on its rate hiking cycle, and although it plans to reduce the size of its balance sheet it will only do so at a snail’s pace, which limits the impetus to buy the dollar on the back of Fed policy normalisation. This could be Janet Yellen’s final Jackson Hole conference, her term expires in 2018, and there is no guarantee that she will be given another term by President Trump.

This could mean that her final appearance is either meaningless – she won’t be setting policy soon anyway – or she could say explicitly what the Fed should do next and what the government is failing to do to help the economy, and throw caution to the wind as she won’t be governor for that much longer. If she chooses the latter, we still think that the market reaction will be quite small. There is now a less than 50% chance of a rate hike in December, and we think it is too early for the Fed to commit to another rate hike that far out, especially with inflation pressure so low. We also believe that the Fed’s policy tool of choice going forward will be the balance sheet, however, if that happens we believe that the market effect will be smaller, and may not be enough to ignite a dollar recovery in the long term. Thus, although we see the dollar clawing back some gains in the next week or so, we don’t think that it will make a sustained recovery in the long term especially not against the EUR and AUD.
The Bank of England: Although the BOE governor said during the presentation of the August Inflation Report that the Bank will hike rates, we don’t think that it will do so for some time. A rate hike is roughly priced in for the end of 2018, but that is so far out it has virtually no bearing on the FX market. The pound is likely to meander around multi-year lows of $1.25 vs. the USD and EUR/GBP may reach parity, both of which would be good news for the FTSE 100. Brexit uncertainty, a weak economic outlook, falling inflation and negative real wage growth tie the BOE’s hands for the long term and also could weigh on the pound as we move into the autumn.
The Reserve Bank of Australia: Minutes from the RBA this week and more talk about currency strength, were the order of the day for the Aussie. The RBA said it would be willing to intervene to weaken the Aussie if it thinks it is appropriate, however, it had no plans to change monetary policy. This was like a red rag for Aussie bulls, and in the aftermath of Wednesday’s minutes AUD/USD has rallied nearly 2%. The lesson here is: don’t start on intervention talk if you don’t plan on changing monetary policy. The RBA may find out, along with the ECB, that you can’t always get what you want, but empty threats against a currency usually don’t work out as planned, as the RBA is starting to realise. The Aussie is currently the strongest currency in the G10 this week.
The Riksbank: The pressure is on the Swedish central bank to hike rates, they currently stand at -0.5%, however, growth is strong and CPI is rising fast, on an annual rate it jumped from 1.7% to 2.2% in July. The Riksbank is known for its cautious approach and it is not expected to hike rates when it next meets on 7th September, the same day as the ECB. However, with price pressure building, we expect that it will have to start hiking soon, and the bank may confirm as much at next month’s meeting. This should keep upwards pressure on the SEK especially versus the JPY and GBP. We also think that USD/SEK could fall further if Janet Yellen strikes a dovish tone at next week’s Jackson Hole conference.

Sunday, August 20, 2017

But Chen Long, China economist at Gavekal Dragonomics in Beijing, said this methodology implicitly assumes that an economic crash will eventually occur in China. But if that economic crash doesn’t occur, and if the economy continues to grow, credit will perform better, and loans won’t go bad to that extent, he argues. The government understands this too. Hence the mantra that growth must be maintained no matter what the costs. But since that growth is debt-fueled, and since it is now taking more and more debt to obtain diminishing growth rates, the math gets a little tricky. So an acute crisis does not appear imminent, Chu told the FT. The authorities - combination of central bank and government - control the state-owned megabanks and can tell them to lend more even to zombie companies, many of them state-owned, to refinance nonperforming debts, to lend to smaller banks that rely on interbank funding, and to support the debt bubble in other ways. This keeps the money flowing. It has kept a credit crisis from toppling the system. And as long as the megabanks have the total support of the authorities, they won’t topple either. So where does that leave China short sellers, like Kyle Bass, who bet very publicly against the monstrous credit bubble in China and against the yuan? Publicly shorting China, hoping for an implosion, is like daring the Chinese authorities – the government, the central bank, the state-owned megabanks, and their whole apparatus – to come out and crush you. And they do that just to make a point. The yuan, after declining relentlessly from the beginning of 2014 through the end of 2016, is up over 3% against the dollar so far this year... The USD let's ever more safe, and the USD without question .. You see the Chinese , have huge problem to face as forecast for things to come, well a turn for the worst, By orchestrating this superficial appearance of stability of the bad-debt problem, the authorities have over the years allowed and encouraged this problem to get much worse.

The upside is fake stability. The downside is too ugly to contemplate.
Corporate debt in China has soared to $18 trillion, or 169% of GDP, the largest pile of corporate debt in the world, according to the worried Bank for International Settlements. The OECD has warned about it earlier this year. The New York Fed warned about this debt boom in February and that it could lead to a “financial crisis,” but that authorities have many tools to control it.
The IMF regularly warns about China’s corporate debt, broken-record-like, and did so again a few days ago, lambasting the authorities for their reluctance to tamp down on the growth of debt. The “current trajectory,” it said, “could eventually lead to a sharp adjustment.”
The Chinese authorities – the government and the central bank, supported by the state-owned megabanks – have allowed some bonds to default, rather than bail them out, to make some kind of theoretical point, and they have been working furiously on a balancing act, tamping down on the credit growth that fuels the economy and simultaneously stimulating the economy with more credit to keep the debt bubble from imploding. A misstep could create a global mess.
“Everyone knows there’s a credit problem in China, but I find that people often forget about the scale; it’s important in global terms,” Charlene Chu told the Financial Times. Back in 2011, when she was still a China banking analyst at Fitch Ratings, she went out on a limb with her radical estimates that there was much more debt than disclosed by the central bank, particularly in the shadow banking system, that banks were concealing risky loans in off-balance-sheet vehicles, and that this soaring opaque debt could have nasty consequences. Her outlandish views at the time have since then become the consensus.
And this pile of debt is in much worse shape than officially acknowledged, she says in her latest report, cited by the FT. She’s now with Autonomous Research. She figured that by the end of 2017, bad debt in China could hit 51 trillion yuan, or $7.6 trillion.
Corporate debt in China has soared to $18 trillion, or 169% of GDP, the largest pile of corporate debt in the world, according to the worried Bank for International Settlements. The OECD has warned about it earlier this year. The New York Fed warned about this debt boom in February and that it could lead to a “financial crisis,” but that authorities have many tools to control it.

The IMF regularly warns about China’s corporate debt, broken-record-like, and did so again a few days ago, lambasting the authorities for their reluctance to tamp down on the growth of debt. The “current trajectory,” it said, “could eventually lead to a sharp adjustment.”

The Chinese authorities – the government and the central bank, supported by the state-owned megabanks – have allowed some bonds to default, rather than bail them out, to make some kind of theoretical point, and they have been working furiously on a balancing act, tamping down on the credit growth that fuels the economy and simultaneously stimulating the economy with more credit to keep the debt bubble from imploding. A misstep could create a global mess.

“Everyone knows there’s a credit problem in China, but I find that people often forget about the scale; it’s important in global terms,” Charlene Chu told the Financial Times. Back in 2011, when she was still a China banking analyst at Fitch Ratings, she went out on a limb with her radical estimates that there was much more debt than disclosed by the central bank, particularly in the shadow banking system, that banks were concealing risky loans in off-balance-sheet vehicles, and that this soaring opaque debt could have nasty consequences. Her outlandish views at the time have since then become the consensus.

And this pile of debt is in much worse shape than officially acknowledged, she says in her latest report, cited by the FT. She’s now with Autonomous Research. She figured that by the end of 2017, bad debt in China could hit 51 trillion yuan, or $7.6 trillion.

Or about 68% of GDP! It would take the bad-debt ratio to an astronomical 34% of all loans, and way above the 5.3% that the authorities are proffering.

And the authorities – the government, the central bank, supported by the state-owned banks – are now pulling all levers to keep this under control.

“What I’ve gotten a greater appreciation for is how everything is so orchestrated by the authorities,” she said. “The upside is that it creates stability. The downside is that it can create a problem of proportions that people would think is never possible. We’re moving into that territory.”

By orchestrating this superficial appearance of stability of the bad-debt problem, the authorities have over the years allowed and encouraged this problem to get much worse.

Chu’s methodology, as the FT pointed out, is not without critics:

In particular, her estimate of Rmb51tn in bad debt is based on average credit losses across 11 other economies that previously experienced rapid debt increases comparable to China, including Japan in 1985-97 and the US in 2000-07.

But Chen Long, China economist at Gavekal Dragonomics in Beijing, said this methodology implicitly assumes that an economic crash will eventually occur in China.
But if that economic crash doesn’t occur, and if the economy continues to grow, credit will perform better, and loans won’t go bad to that extent, he argues.

The government understands this too. Hence the mantra that growth must be maintained no matter what the costs. But since that growth is debt-fueled, and since it is now taking more and more debt to obtain diminishing growth rates, the math gets a little tricky.

So an acute crisis does not appear imminent, Chu told the FT. The authorities - combination of central bank and government - control the state-owned megabanks and can tell them to lend more even to zombie companies, many of them state-owned, to refinance nonperforming debts, to lend to smaller banks that rely on interbank funding, and to support the debt bubble in other ways. This keeps the money flowing. It has kept a credit crisis from toppling the system. And as long as the megabanks have the total support of the authorities, they won’t topple either.

So where does that leave China short sellers, like Kyle Bass, who bet very publicly against the monstrous credit bubble in China and against the yuan?

Publicly shorting China, hoping for an implosion, is like daring the Chinese authorities – the government, the central bank, the state-owned megabanks, and their whole apparatus – to come out and crush you. And they do that just to make a point. The yuan, after declining relentlessly from the beginning of 2014 through the end of 2016, is up over 3% against the dollar so far this year.

And so far, the authorities still have this credit bubble under control. They have special tools since they control not only the monetary printing press but also the lenders and the borrowers. This is why Chu conceded that, since her bold pronouncements years ago, she has “gotten a greater appreciation” for “how everything is so orchestrated by the authorities.” The upside is the current fake stability. The downside is too ugly to contemplate.

China’s efforts to keep the debt bubble under control already impacted in the US, where the last big enthusiastic buyer, China, is leaving the party. Read… This Hits the Wheezing Commercial Real Estate Bubble at Worst Possible Time

Use the nuke option, on , than capsize & , boom, 3 birds w/ 1 Stone, , ,

Saturday, August 19, 2017

A New Tool to Track Russian Disinformation on Twitter. Alliance for Securing Democracy» project it has launched- Gaining a Leg UP ON Russian- Propaganda Machine. The proliferation of belligerent Soviet gangs from enslaving the entire Usa into service to the Communistic Soviet robot operators and jobless titles as the dealing deathblow to weaken the West ..i'm personally horrified at the aspect that my once bountiful insurance is not gratuitously turned to toilet paper while the RUSSIAN maffia lives high on the hog as first class citizens..there are too many shitty things going on that need reversing which will send millions into the gutters. Yes. that's what i said. if you followed my campaign, i tracked their communist activities of money laundering and campaign finance fraud since the pre -Obama regime it's a matter of time before they are emboldened enough to start the Bolshevik romanov style genocide campaign to steel the rest of the money entitlements and intellectual properties from the non communists constituents. but the pentagon has assured me they stand to defend the USA from enemies foreign and domestic. and according to the constitution, your citizenship is revoked t he minute you conspire to commit a felony. and that's several felonies. so like i said. it will look like a nuclear terrorist attack with *"MASS DEATH***" and all that. i'm going to change that from " the communists" (which itself, is a term that is very ambiguously defined) to "bureaucrats" which is what they are. a self anointed fundamentalist regime that steals from the hard working leaders of out society and anoints itself as "Leaders" which they clearly are not .

‘The German Marshall Fund, Through its strangely Soviet-sounding »Alliance for Securing Democracy» project it has launched something called «Hamilton 68: A New Tool to Track Russian Disinformation on Twitter». --  EXPLORE THE TOOL CREATED TO TRACK RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION (600 RUSSIAN Twitter dISINFO from Putin (the AntiChrist) tracked




‘This project monitors 600 Twitter accounts that the German Marshall Fund claims are «accounts that are involved in promoting Russian influence and disinformation goals».

\Russia and China, and their systems’ struggles for survival, in the upcoming second volume of The Origins of Political Order.


I


The West should be particularly concerned about the future of these two models of the centralized state. The impact that Russia and China have on global security and the world economy is not the only cause for concern. More importantly, both authoritarian systems have found a way to exploit liberal democracy, and both have been quite successful at doing this. Since the fall of Communism, Russia’s personalized regime has been able to use the West as an important guarantor of its stability. It has also been sponging off liberal democracies, in the form of its elite’s personal integration into Western society. This integration has led to the creation of powerful pro-Kremlin lobbying structures that are undermining the normative foundation of liberal democracy (in fact, the Western politicians often don’t even recognize that this is what is happening). It is unclear how the Putin regime will survive, now that it has embarked on the path of consolidating itself by rejecting the West and treating it as an enemy

In September 2010, Leonard Blavatnik, Obama's chief Puppeter , bigger and ever more distasteful than his other slightly smaller backer of Obama, the conduit, George Soros.—It beomes evident why in fact Obama seemed as though Obama had been undermining Soros, For instance Soros lobbying Barack for the essence legalizing offshore drilling on the Atlantic Coast. WIth that being said, he encatce the Soros favorbale policy, but then months later outlawed it.  There had been no consistancy in his overall rehotoric , besides the theme in his what seemed to be apparent    But this Russian-American industrialist mentioned above and
reputed to be the sixth richest man in Britain – gave a £75 million, or $119 million, donation to Oxford
University to open what is now called Blavatnik School of Government (BSG). BSG’s ultimate idea is to
compete with Kennedy’s School of Government, Harvard University on a global scale. In spring 2012,
Blavatnik was praised at a lavish reception at Waldorf Astoria as a “one of the global leaders of the 21st
century” and in October 2012 Blavatnik received an exceptional award from Chris Patten, Chancellor of
Oxford University, called Sheldon Medal.165
 In 2007 Blavatnik together with New York Academy of
Sciences has also sponsored “Blavatnik Awards for Young Scientists” for young postdoctoral and faculty
scientists who work in New York, New Jersey, or Connecticut.
166
In 2008-2010, Dmytro Firtash, one of the richest tycoons from Ukraine with strong links to
President Viktor Yanukovych and Russia’s Gazprom, made a number of donations to the University of
Cambridge.167 Reportedly, Firtash made most of his money through opaque gas trade schemes between
Russia and Ukraine which has been questioned by FBI, Ukrainian and Russian opposition. In 2011 he
actually filed a libel lawsuit against a Ukrainian paper the Kyiv Post, citing his donations to the University
as one of the reasons he has chosen to pursue the case through the British Courts.168
In 2011, Boris Jordan, an American businessman of Russian origin, gave a grant to New York
University to establish what is now The Jordan Center for the Advanced Study of Russia. This center
often holds panels that discuss freedom of press and media in Russia. Paradoxically, in 2001-2003 Jordan
who had close connections with Russian financial elite and government, was the Director General of the
Russian TV channel NTV and also the Director General of Gazprom Media, a subsidiary media holding of
Gazprom (now of Gazprombank) that owned NTV. Unlike US media and NYU, Russian opposition still
remembers vividly that on 3 April 2001, Gazprom Media conducted a shareholders’ meeting with
violations of procedures and removed the lawful director Evgeniy Kiselyov from the NTV Director
General position. On 14 April 2001, Gazprom took over NTV by force and brought in its own

165 http://www.campaign.ox.ac.uk/news/blavatnik_medal.html
166 http://blavatnikawards.org/about/
167 http://www.cambridgetrust.org/partners/dmitry-firtash
168 http://www.varsity.co.uk/news/3112
48
management team, headed by Boris Jordan. Many leading Russian journalists, including Yevgeniy
Kiselyov, Svetlana Sorokina, Viktor Shenderovich, Vladimir A. Kara-Murza, Dmitry Dibrov, left the
company because of this violent suppression of the lawful media outlet. Citizens concerned by the
threat to the freedom of speech in Russia argued that the financial pressure on NTV was inspired by the
Vladimir Putin’s government, which was often subject to NTV’s criticism. Some tens of thousands of
Russians rallied to the call of dissident NTV journalists in order to support the old NTV staff in April 2001.
Within the next couple of years, two independent TV channels which absorbed the former NTV
journalists, TV-6 and TVS, were also shut down. At the end of 2001, the Washington Post article argued
that after the new management headed by Jordan forced its way into NTV, the channel ceased to be
independent and became a loyal outlet for Kremlin.169
Conclusions.
Summary and policy suggestions
The overwhelming negligence that we, in general, see in regard to the Russian regime and its
affiliates on the political agenda of US, UK and Western European countries is occurring because Russia
is seen as difficult but relatively stable state, trying as always to maximize its influence but playing
generally from a weak hand (or at least it is perceived as such).170 US and European policy makers have
other concerns and they are simply not interested in Russia while national parliaments lack knowledge
about Russian corrosive practices. At the same time US and UK do not want to antagonize Russia on
issues that are seen as secondary to the objectives of securing regional security in certain conflict zones
of the world and enhancing solely economic cooperation based on large business and trade.
At the time when Obama’s “Re-set” policy is considered dead171, Russian press-secretary almost
publicly mocks Britain, the little island, as diplomatically irrelevant172, and Russian security and

169 http://www.newsru.com/russia/07dec2001/jordan_ntv.html
170 http://www.novayagazeta.ru/politics/57953.html
171 http://www.gazeta.ru/politics/news/2013/05/24/n_2930037.shtml
172 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/10290243/Russia-mocks-Britain-the-littleisland.html
49
diplomatic corps are increasingly distancing themselves from joint security173 and political treaties with
the West, US and UK administrations should finally realize what type of regime and legacy they are
dealing with. In USSR there was a Communist party rule, where Politburo members held KGB and other
security forces under control. Now the regime is controlled by former KGB members themselves without
any party control and they are ready to employ all mechanisms in the security and political spheres that
KGB was good with in Soviet times for their current global business interests, ranging from energy to all
other possible industries.174 In this task ex-KGB ruling elite is hugely enhanced on global stage through
hands of extremely wealthy and mostly loyal tycoons, who often have questionable track record
(carefully recorded by the Kremlin and FSB) and are fearful to lose their assets and connections in
Russia. These tycoons are helping to extend questionable practices and values of the Russian political
and economic system in all walks of western life. In the table below we have summarized all different
layers of corrosion export mentioned in this article with their characteristics, effects on US and UK and
possible policy suggestions.


It's clear as crystal that the overwhelming composite for the distributor and fake news blitzer , without questions is in fact key industry Warner Record Label,   that you really want to know why? because people look to the us to defend them from eventualities.. and as you said. even people in the usa thought the usa was collapsing politically when obama shilled out an effective trillion to the bankrupted Russian covert gangsters.. it's horrifying to imagine them gaining control of the government and requiring the pentagon to erase them . it would be more convenient to oust them and say terrorists did it.. but if there was a strong enough nation, they could just step in and later say" excuse us"

If that makes you sick to your stomach, then you see that nobody is stopping the proliferation of belligerent Soviet gangs  from enslaving the entire Usa into service to the Communistic Soviet robot operators and jobless titles as the dealing deathblow to weaken the West ..i'm personally horrified at the aspect that my once bountiful insurance is not gratuitously turned to toilet paper while the RUSSIAN maffia lives high on the hog as first class citizens..there are too many shitty things going on that need reversing which will send millions into the gutters.
Yes. that's what i said. if you followed my campaign, i tracked their communist activities of money laundering and campaign finance fraud since the pre -Obama regime it's a matter of time before they are emboldened enough to start the Bolshevik romanov style genocide campaign to steel the rest of the money entitlements and intellectual properties from the non communists constituents. but the pentagon has assured me they stand to defend the USA from enemies foreign and domestic. and according to the constitution, your citizenship is revoked t he minute you conspire to commit a felony. and that's several felonies. so like i said. it will look like a nuclear terrorist attack with *"MASS DEATH***" and all  that. i'm going to change that from " the communists"  (which itself, is a term that is very ambiguously defined) to  "bureaucrats" which is what they are. a self anointed fundamentalist regime that steals from the hard working leaders of out society and anoints itself as "Leaders" which they clearly are not  .


Monday, August 14, 2017

Democratic Party lawmakers, US Senator Ben Cardin, triumphantly declaring “We make the laws, not the President of the United States”. And as President Trump just hours ago warned that relations between the US and Russia are at an all-time and very dangerous low, and his adding that the American people should blame the US Congress for this turn of events, this report concludes, his sudden announcement that he is going into seclusion for 17 days (beginning Friday) has raised further alarms among Security Council members wondering who exactly is now in control of the United States.



World's Largest English Language News Service with Over 500 Articles Updated Daily
"The News You Need Today…For The World You’ll Live In Tomorrow." 

 

August 3, 2017
Russia Declares “State Of War Now Exists”: Orders “Masterchain” Destruction Of America
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
An apocalyptic sounding new report released in the Kremlin today by the Security Council (SC) affirms that state of war” now exists between the Federation and the United States—with all members, including President Putin, authorizing a Masterchain” counter attackagainst the Americans that, if fully successful, could see that nations entire economy destroyed by the end of October.  [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]


.
According to this report (and as we warned about in our 23 July article New US Law To Remove Trump From Power And Declare War On Russia “Will Be Met By Force”), President Donald Trump, yesterday, was unable to withstand the “Deep State” forces arrayed against him, thus causing him to sign a new sanctions regime against Russia that specifically targets all of Russia’s major industries for destruction—and that Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev quickly responded to by grimly stating:
“The signing of new sanctions against Russiainto law by the US president leads to several consequences. First, any hope of improving our relations with the new US administration is over. Second, the US just declared a full-scale trade war on Russia. Third, the Trump administration demonstrated it is utterly powerless, and in the most humiliating manner transferred executive powers to Congress.
This shifts the alignment of forces in US political circles.
What does this mean for the U.S.? The American establishment completely outplayed Trump. The president is not happy with the new sanctions, but he could not avoid signing the new law.
The purpose of the new sanctions was to put Trump in his place. Their ultimate goal is to remove Trump from power. An incompetent player must be eliminated.
At the same time, the interests of American businesses were almost ignored. Politics rose above the pragmatic approach. Anti-Russian hysteria has turned into a key part of not only foreign (as has been the case many times), but also domestic US policy (this is recent).
The sanctions codified into law will now last for decades, unless some miracle occurs.”

Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev announces full scale trade war now exists between Russia and US

. With the American “Deep State” now firmly in control of the United States, this report continues, President Putin’s orders, issued in late 2016, to “prepare for war” against the United States have now been accelerated—and none more fearful than “Operation Masterchain”.
In October 2016 when President Putin ordered these preparations for war, this report says, the Western propaganda media, also, failed to report to their peoples that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation had developed a “Masterchain” prototype and successfully made its first test transactions—and that is one of the most fearsome weapons of global economic warfare ever invented.


Managed by FinTech under the governance of the Central Bank of Russia, this report explains, the Federation has become the first nation in the world to digitalize its entire domestic and international economy under the “blockchain” distributed database system (the most important invention since the Internet itself)—and that Tunisia became, in January 2016, the first nation in the world to convert its currency into.
Though many in the world know about crypto currencies (such as Bitcoin and Tunisia’s eDinar), this report details, very few understand the staggering implications of its underlying “blockchain” infrastructure—that is the most secure method of transferring wealth (of all kinds) ever invented, is impervious to hacking and/or spying, and by the day is revolutionizing our entire planet.
With the United States placing its entire economic future under the full control of a vast global military structure, that requires continual conquest of other nations, and has wasted trillions-of-dollars of that nations wealth, this report continues, Russia, instead, invested its economic future in the “Blockchain Revolution—that is called “Masterchain” and whose crypto currency has been named “Gas.
Once fully operational, this report notes, “Masterchain” and “Gas” will provide to the world the most secure and secret method of transferring wealth history has ever known—and will be impervious to sanctions, spying and all Western interference.
As nearly all Western economists are warning that the American stock markets are heading for an October 2017 crash of epic proportions, this report says, President Putin has today ordered both “Masterchain” and “Gas” to “immediately prepare” for this global economic crisis offering “safety and security” to everyone seeking to protect their wealth and investments.

Want to know more? (And you really should!) Click HERE.

.
And with trillions-of-dollars flowing into “Masterchain” and “Gas”, this report explains, the United States will be unable to find any global liquidity to sustain itself—as it is already being crushed by its massive $19.9 trillion debt—that when distributed among its 326.7 million citizens, sees each of them owing their government a staggering $60,192 for each and every one of them.
Russia, however, this report continues, has never matched the warmongers in America and has kept defense spending at a fraction of what the US spends—thus allowing the Federation to have a miniscule national debt of only $157.9 billion—that can be paid off instantly from Russia’s $412 billion of savings—and whose 143 million citizens owe nothing—and all of whom live in a nation twice the size of the United States having a total national wealth of $75 trillion.


.
With the “Deep State” now firmly in control of the US Congress, this report warns, their bloodlust shows no signs of abating either as they are now, also, preparing several defense bills that would require their Department of Defense to violate the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty with Russia through the development of medium-range missiles banned under the accord—with one of their top Democratic Party lawmakers, US Senator Ben Cardin, triumphantly declaring “We make the laws, not the President of the United States”.
And as President Trump just hours ago warned that relations between the US and Russia are at an all-time and very dangerous low, and his adding that the American people should blame the US Congress for this turn of events, this report concludes, his sudden announcement that he is going into seclusion for 17 days (beginning Friday) has raised further alarms among Security Council members wondering who exactly is now in control of the United States.


Other reports in this series include:
August 3, 2017 © EU and US all rights reserved.  Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.
[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth.  Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]
[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]
[Note: The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to Russian citadels, including in Moscow, having cathedrals wherein female Schema monks (Orthodox nuns) reside, many of whom are devoted to the mission of the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.]